Blog
the flutter author num is: SELECT post_id FROM wp_postmeta where meta_key = 'wp_user_id' AND meta_value = '1'

What are you working for?

(total read time: 7 minutes)

If you got to the position of your bosses boss, would you be happy?

If you got to choose your job, would you choose the path of highest average gain with medium risk or highest possible gain with maximum risk?

Just as anybody who dedicates their life to music has at one point imagined themself as an international rockstar, anybody who willfully dedicates their life to the Internet has at one point imagined themselves being beyond a boss; being part of something magical.

Which websites represent the rockstars we aspire to be? You already know what they are, because they all reached a level where they registered resoundingly in the national consciousness, and there’s one every 18 months or so in accordance with Moore’s law.

Chronologically they are Yahoo, Google, Amazon, eBay, Myspace, Netflix, Youtube, Facebook, Twitter.

So you’re saying there’s a chance.

There are a few patterns uniting this batch of sites.

1. None of them solved an existing problem. Instead, they all created entirely novel experiences.

If your focus is on fixing a problem, you’ve given yourself a ceiling that’s too low.

2. None of them were carried by a brilliant or unique idea. Instead, they were all solid ideas that hundreds or thousands of people may have had concurrently — but only one team executed and executed well enough to be a leader.

If you’re focused on concept over execution, you’ll be sitting on a barstool lamenting the fact that someone else took “your” idea.

3. None of them were started by a lone individual.

If you’re not actively surrounding yourself with people who inspire and challenge you, it’s going to take you decades to catch up.

4. None of them were a first venture.

Overnight successes were underground for decades. The great ones have always had a sort of urgent patience, like stubborn turtles.

5. None of them were started with financial profit as the primary motivation (despite some having fantastic business models).

If the money’s anything more than a bonus of your endeavor, you’ve already lost.

What was all that one in a million talk??

If you’re going to pursue the Grail, you can’t be reliant on praise or encouragement from others. You’re going to have to discount 90% of what anyone not pursuing the same Grail says to you.

Most people, including your parents, will laugh in your face if you tell them that you’re going to make the next Facebook. “A few get lucky; for every one that succeeds theres a million that fail.”

Here’s the thing about other people’s advice though: no-one believes in you. When you yourself can’t even articulate what it is you know you’re capable of, no-one is going to make that assumption on your behalf.

Do you think Steven Tyler’s mom or dad looked at him when he was 15 and said “Son put down those books, you were born to be a rock star. Here’s a guitar and a bottle of whiskey, now get in your room and make some f*cking rock and roll”. No.

If you have a special gift, you also have a special burden of needing that gift to emerge and manifest itself and a special constraint of not being able to follow any of the paths cleared for you by friends and family.

Shoot for the moon and land on the damn moon.

The benefits of owning, creating, or otherwise being associated with a Grail site are obvious to any casual observer. Rich and famous, right? Wrong. Those are the symptoms, but not the disease.

There is a higher good than money or fame: glory.

As Gary and AJ put it, “Legacy > Currency”. As Lil Wayne put it, “I don’t want the glow, I want the glo-ry”. As Drake put it “It’s funny when you coming in first, but you hope, that you last/you just hope, that it lasts”.

Chris Rock originated a wildly accurate phrase that says you always lose money chasing women but never lose women chasing money. It goes up another level. You always lose glory chasing money, but you never lose money chasing glory.

75% of the time, you’re screwed anyway.

An abstraction of any challenge that can always embolden you is that you only control at most half of the variables. All you can control is your preparation and belief. It looks like this:

You don’t think you can You think you can
“Luck” favors you Fail. Glory.
“Luck” passes you by Fail. Fail.

To some this chart is daunting — to me it’s freeing. You’re probably screwed anyway. Might as well try.

I gotta get back to work but…thoughts?

Filed Under: Advice, Development, pressure

Author: Neil Sarkar

Frank Angelone is a born and raised New Yorker from Long Island. Frank is a graduate of Penn State University with a degree in Management and a minor in Information Systems Management. He’s a huge sports fan and enjoys entrepreneurship. Prior to moving back to New York where he grew up, Frank lived in Illinois while doing an internship and in Pittsburgh where he had his first job out of college. However, his ultimate goal was to work in an environment that combined both his passions for technology and social media. Taking on the role as Project Manager for Vaynermedia was the perfect fit.
  • Macs84

    that rings damn true to me buddy

  • http://maxbeatty.com Max Beatty

    Why doesn't the Vaynermedia blog offer a full RSS feed? I would really appreciate it.

  • http://twitter.com/fnbleadership Darcy MacDonell

    The Steven Tyler example is brilliant!

  • TheGreatWazu

    Thoughts? Fucking brilliant post. Many people need to read this entire post. “If the money’s anything more than a bonus of your endeavor, you’ve already lost.” <————–BINGO!

  • http://twitter.com/NeilSarkar Neil Sarkar

    Sorry about that Max, just changed the WordPress settings to display the last 100 full posts, so it should update within the hour.

    Kind of can't believe we overlooked that (well it makes sense since our team email is like a blog rss feed) but thanks for pointing it out.

  • http://twitter.com/NeilSarkar Neil Sarkar

    Thanks Darcy.

    It's really the most succinct way to illustrate the very important point that while many people may support you, none of them will push you to take risks that they themselves wouldn't take…which may be exactly what you need.

    It's not really their role to push you to do that though, it's like how a Psychologist will help you explore your mind but the answer to a problem will never be “you should leave the office, buck up, stop thinking so much and just do something about it”

  • http://twitter.com/NeilSarkar Neil Sarkar

    Thanks, glad to hear it resonated with you.

    It resonated with me too — I had a completely different topic planned but couldn't sleep last night and wrote this in like three hours…and I still feel like I could write a whole post on half the sentences in here.

    Good luck to you, hopefully when your chance comes you'll be ready to seize it (or if you miss it, at least an early investment stake in one of the next ones)

  • http://twitter.com/NeilSarkar Neil Sarkar

    Haha thanks Wazu! Glad you enjoyed it.

    That's actually like the third sentence I wrote and a lot of the post sort of expanded out from that concept.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=4500009 Michael E. Gruen

    I am a stubborn turtle.

  • http://techneur.com/ JP

    I love the article up until the last paragraph. I hate the matrix, as it implies that if “You think you can” and “Luck favors you” you get glory. It takes a lot more than that… I believe that you know that as well, your ending just sucks. But the rest of the article is right on the money. Nice job.

  • http://twitter.com/RossHudgens Ross Hudgens

    Well done take on what could've been another boring motivational post with no actual punch. Especially like “shoot for the moon and land on the damn moon”. Cheers.

  • http://twitter.com/kevinmspence Kevin

    Breaks my heart to see that nobody else got the Dumb and Dumber references. Well done, Sir.

  • http://twitter.com/barefoot_exec Carrie Wilkerson

    Hmmm I am guilty of saying 'shoot for the moon and even if you miss, blah blah' — but I like yours better!

    Thanks for putting it out there

    Carrie Wilkerson
    The Barefoot Executive

  • http://twitter.com/NeilSarkar Neil Sarkar

    That's a good point, it's a little unclear.

    Originally I had “you're prepared and you haven't lost faith in yourself” or something like that but it got broken into two lines and I had been spending too long formatting that table as is.

    I also simplified the left side to “luck” when it's really a number of other factors (all of which are out of your control).

    I agree with you though, I definitely didn't mean to say all you need is belief in yourself.

    I did mean that your only hope is to try and believe you will make it, because that top left hand box would suck *real* bad.

  • http://twitter.com/NeilSarkar Neil Sarkar

    I know right, they're in

    's and everything!

  • http://twitter.com/NeilSarkar Neil Sarkar

    Thanks for the RT man, cheers.

  • http://twitter.com/NeilSarkar Neil Sarkar

    Yeah I just came up with it too, I also like it better than the original.

    Especially because thinking you can shoot for the moon and land on the stars implies a fairly flawed understanding of basic astronomy.

  • http://twitter.com/NeilSarkar Neil Sarkar

    You know that if you manually take them off their path they re-align themselves, right? Pretty cool trait for a spirit animal.

  • TheGreatWazu

    I'd say “You think you can” assumes you've totally prepared and have the goods, otherwise you'd be a fool to think you can. The table stands perfect its just sometimes you need a little bit more of either “belief” or “luck' than the other. Good table.

  • http://www.suadellc.com Nnamdi

    There is a greater good than money or fame = GREATNESS!
    http://www.nnamdinwoke.com <~ Greatness Awaits!

  • Sean

    Interesting. I think of point 1 as being completely reversed. The companies mentioned solved an existing problem in a radical way which created a unique experience.

    Here some of the problems that were solved or greatly improved upon:
    Google radically improved upon the existing problem of how we find items on the internet
    Amazon allowed readers to search and purchase a vast number of books that couldn't be held in a single physical location.
    Netflix essentially did the same thing as Amazon, but to movies.
    Facebook allowed people to solve the problem of how can we stay in touch and become connected
    Ebay solved the problem of how to get rid of my junk/car/house/socks

    On the flip side, I could give you a completely novel experience such as a new way to brush your teeth. Since you don't have that problem (nice picture!) then it is not that beneficial especially as a business. So I would go with identify a problem and attack it to the point in which people can't help, but see it as novel.

  • http://twitter.com/NeilSarkar Neil Sarkar

    That's the power of retrospect — you know, the “hindsight is 20:20″ thing.

    Now that those sites and experiences have been invented, it's clear that they solve a problem. But before they were invented, no-one was clamoring for a solution.

    All inventions solve problems. The truly remarkable inventions solve problems we didn't even know we had.

    I guess that was my point. I'm glad you brought it up though; I knew that point was tenuous. Your challenging viewpoint forced me to understand and articulate my hunch more clearly.

    So maybe the correct phrasing is “discovering a problem before solving it”. Or maybe the key word is “existing”. It's an existing problem if most people identify it as such.

    Right now — right now — we are all unconsciously coping with horrible, soul-crushing problems. But no-one has showed us a solution that exposes the problem.

    I guess that's what inspires me about all these companies: they discovered a widespread problem by proposing a solution.

  • Sean

    Fascinating. I see the hindsight 20/20 coming into play from an outsider perspective. If you are a founder or inventor then you have believe and often sell the idea that there is a problem that can be solved.

    I would argue that there are many companies that are clamoring for a solution before a dominate player emerges. If we take a look at Google there were (and still are) many players in the search space such as Excite, Yahoo and Dogpile before they became the current leader. In the social space, Facebook is dominate, but other companies are certainly trying such as MySpace and Friendster.

    I like the phrasing 'discovering a problem before solving it,' well put. The discovery process is the realization of the problem itself and hopefully a solution.

    The unconscious soul crushing problems are the problems that we won't solve (almost by definition – how does one solve a problem that they are conscious of?). The problems that we will solve are that we see as painful and ideally become aware of feasible solution.

    Good stuff and thanks for the reply.

  • http://www.ryancmiller.com ryancmiller

    Neil,

    Hey man just wanted to leave a comment and let you know that i really dug this post. Inspiring and a kick in the pants as well.

    “shoot for the moon and land on the damn moon” is the best piece of biz advice I've heard in a while.

    Looking forward to more of your posts. Cheers!
    Rm

  • http://twitter.com/NeilSarkar Neil Sarkar

    Hey thanks man…I'm due for one this coming Wednesday, glad you liked this one.

  • http://www.lonnietapia.com/ lonnietapia

    What's the “(total read time: 7 minutes)” for?

blog comments powered by Disqus