Blog

Redesigning Your Facebook Tabs: From 760px to 520px

Business Advice By Adam Kopec Jan 28th |

As you may have heard by now, Facebook announced in October that they will be making major changes to all existing fan pages by “late ’09, early ’10.” Much to the excitement of online marketers everywhere, Facebook is rolling out with a new e-mail API that will allow organizations and business to directly collect user e-mail addresses. Facebook will also be getting rid of the boxes feature, as well as cutting the maximum width of their custom Facebook tabs from 760px to 520px, essentially forcing developers and designers who work on Facebook (like me) to retroactively re-do all of our previous, wider-than-520px, work on Facebook. Not fun.

So how do us designers and developers prepare for this unmistakably annoying task? Well, over the past few weeks, the crew here at VaynerMedia have bit the bullet, and converted nearly all of our clients’ Facebook pages to the appropriate size, free of cost. The following are some insights into our process of converting existing tabs to fit the new format, and how we’ve prepared for the upcoming storm.

What a Disaster!

Upon first hearing the news – our design/development team thought the process would be an absolute mess… and rightfully so! Our meticulously planned layouts and images were suddenly going to be snuffed out by some arbitrary decision and inexplicitly vague deadline. Plus, we were going to have to go back and redesign all of our previous work. We didn’t have much time, either, as we still had a full slate of current client projects that needed to be taken care of in the upcoming weeks.

However, as we began the process of redesigning, we noticed the workspace reduction wasn’t as severe as originally thought. In fact, with a workspace reduction of ~30%, we were actually able to tighten up our interfaces in some areas, while still allowing enough pixels to allow our designs to breathe and maintain their clarity (with a little adjustment of course.)

Rollover to see the size change with Gary’s Facebook Tab. The pink color indicates the 520px mark. (This is not to size – find the link below for a .PSD of the custom tab)

Here are a few things we’ve learned through the process:

Compromise (the right way)

As your content is getting squeezed, it will tend to get pushed down and your custom tab will become elongated. If you had plans on getting a lot of content above the fold, you’ll have to come to terms with that not happening. However you may treat this as a positive, as this may serve as an opportunity to consolidate and boil down your content.

For example, with our client, Sunshine Suites (P.S. If you’re looking for affordable NYC office space, these guys are Crushing It), you’ll notice we had to remove the navigation of the original Facebook page and focused, instead, on a single introduction video with a clear call-to-action inviting the user to Sign Up Now for more information. This ultimately provides a more enjoyable and easily digestible user-experience. By being forced to work in a smaller layout, we were able to consolidate and boil down what was most important, rather than what would otherwise be considered a compromise.

Rollover to see the how the the new size looks above the fold. The old size is the tab zoomed out.

Putting the Time In – Do You Expense the Client?

There’s no way getting around it – you’ll have to put the time in to accommodate these changes. If you’re working for a digital shop that includes some sort of maintenance retainer in the contract, your costs will be covered for the most part.

However, what about freelance designers and developers, do they revisit the work they’ve already completed, possibly months ago, to restructure their work for free as an added value proposition? Or do they charge per project? How will clients react to this change? An interesting metaphor comes to mind: If a customer buys an SUV, and gas prices go up, would the customer be justified in going to the dealership to demand they install a more fuel-efficient part (restructured Facebook tab) in your car for free? Probably not. I believe that the ball is in our court (as well as other digital agencies) at the moment.

How to Prepare for Next Time

In the event Facebook decides to reduce their custom tabs again in the future, it helps to be a little more prepared. One thing that helped ease the process along was keeping Photoshop layers organized (I know, how many times have you heard that before?). In doing so, we were able to target and resize big chunks of information quickly and efficiently.

Also, from a client-relationship standpoint, accounting for the uncertainty of Facebook and all other social media platforms should be made in future contracts. In writing, it should be made clear that in the event something like this happens again, certain actions should be taken. Perhaps, a redesign/implementation should be offered at a discounted rate? Or perhaps those costs are covered within a monthly retainer?

In Conclusion

Most of what I’ve discussed is still up in the air, as we don’t actually know what exactly will happen to existing custom Facebook pages. Will custom content be distorted or completely cut off? Perhaps Facebook will provide vertical and horizontal scroll bars to allow you to see content not yet converted to the 520px model?

Either way – it never hurts to be prepared. The best way to get through this is to give yourself enough time to implement and learn from this challenge. Adaptation and problem solving is what us designers and developers do best.

What design hurdles have you had to overcome with Facebook’s pixel downsizing?

For your convenience, I’ve included a simple 520px width Facebook template for download to make your transition process just a little easier. If you have any questions, concerns, or just want to bitch about Facebook, shoot me an e-mail or drop a comment below!

Downloads

Below you’ll find a handful of the assets we’ve used in the Facebook conversion process

1) A full .PSD of Gary’s Facebook tab, created by Keith Holjencin, one of VaynerMedia’s in-house designers. Click here to download

2) A blank 520px Facebook template with guides Click here to download

Author: Adam Kopec

Before working as the tallest Graphic/Web Designer at VaynerMedia, Adam graduated Boston University with a degree in Art Direction and Psychology. A native New Jersian (exit 135), Adam spent most of youth playing music in crappy metal bands before he realized being a rockstar wasn't his calling. When he's not making internet things, Adam likes to spend his time wooing the ladies with his guitar and snowboarding out west.

Comments

Add your comment!

 
Showing 33 of 33
  1. Posted January 28, 2010 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    I think “early ’09, late ’10″ should be “late ’09, early ’10″.

    • Posted January 28, 2010 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

      You’re absolutely right – change made! Thanks for spotting that :)

  2. Posted January 28, 2010 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Kudos to you guys for giving this away – along with the blank template.

  3. Posted January 28, 2010 at 3:34 pm | Permalink

    Thanks, this is extremely useful. Any idea when the switch is going to be?

    Hurray to the death of boxes, one of the dumber ideas facebook has launched.

    • Posted January 28, 2010 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

      Hi Sam! Glad to hear you could find this helpful. I have to agree with you about boxes. I always ended up turning them off anyway.

      Unfortunately “early ‘09, late ‘10″ is about all the information we have. If I were a gambling man, which I’m not, I’d say they’d roll out with these changes over the next few weeks. But you really never know!!!

  4. Posted January 28, 2010 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    Hell yeah, this is going to help considering I created a course before the boxes tab got ganked and now I have to redo all of my content.

    Thanks man.

    • Posted January 28, 2010 at 4:16 pm | Permalink

      I hear you Nathan – such a pain. No problem and good luck with everything!

  5. Posted January 28, 2010 at 3:44 pm | Permalink

    Powerful! Can’t wait for these updates!

    • Posted January 28, 2010 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

      Thanks! We’re anxiously excited too. (Now that we’re prepared, anyway)

  6. Posted January 28, 2010 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

    Oh man, you have got to charge your clients for work like this. We run into this all the time when a new browser comes out. There’s no way a client should get the changes you have to make to accommodate IE9 or on the iPad when it comes out for free.

    • Posted January 28, 2010 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

      Gene, thanks for your comment. We wanted to offer this restructuring free of charge as an added value to our clients, especially as a younger company. The story might have been different if we had to revisit more time-intensive rich media applications – but since *most* were built in static HTML, it was fairly easier to resize images and restructure layouts.

  7. Posted January 28, 2010 at 3:50 pm | Permalink

    Thanks guys!

  8. Posted January 28, 2010 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    This is great information. I’m going to see about using it for my Facebook page. Thank you!

    • Posted January 28, 2010 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

      Glad it could be of help! You’re welcome!

  9. Posted January 28, 2010 at 4:38 pm | Permalink

    Great overview and insight to your design process. I like the advice at the end talking about including these kinds of unforeseen design changes in some sort of monthly retainer.

    • Posted January 28, 2010 at 4:54 pm | Permalink

      Hey Kyle – thanks for you comment! I’m glad to hear you enjoyed the insight, its something I’m really happy I could share.

  10. Posted January 28, 2010 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    Hey Adam. I appreciate the helpful info and offering those handy assets downloads. Thanks!

    • Posted January 28, 2010 at 5:38 pm | Permalink

      No problem! Glad it could be of help :)

  11. Posted January 28, 2010 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    Wow, thanks for sharing this story. It sucks. But I think we (designers) can learn from this. I think moving forward, as brands become more in demand of this type of work (i.e. custom facebook, twitter pages, etc.)…we should include clauses in the contract that states if the third-party changes their interface or adjust things, that additional charges will be applied. I think if both parties understand this going in, it’s all understandable. Even if the client doesn’t go for it, you can still work out a deal like maybe they’ll be charged half of your normal hourly rate, etc. Everything’s negotiable. – Thanks for showing the PSD. The Gary Vaynerchuk fb page is sick. Really love that. Very creative.

    ~ Mike

    @mlwebco
    facebook.com/michaellocke160

    • Posted January 28, 2010 at 5:43 pm | Permalink

      Hey Mike – I absolutely agree with your point. It’s something I spent much time thinking about as I was revisiting all my past work.

      So happy you enjoyed the .PSD. I wish I could take credit for it – another one of our designers Keith Holjencin designed it. @keithholjencin Such a talented fella.

      Thanks for your comment!!

  12. Posted January 28, 2010 at 5:26 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for sharing this info and the psd file! After designing the psd file, it still needs to be converted to HTML right?

    • Posted January 28, 2010 at 5:44 pm | Permalink

      Hey Rafael – no prob! Yes, the .PSD needs to be chopped and marked up to be functional in Facebook.

      Thanks for your comment.

  13. Posted January 29, 2010 at 2:37 am | Permalink

    Somebody already commented and made the change, but I was about to say that early 09 to late 10 is a span of almost 2 years. that would have been insane!

    • Posted January 29, 2010 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

      Agreed! Although, even with the correction the deadline is still SO vague for execution teams working on tight deadlines!

  14. Posted January 29, 2010 at 12:12 pm | Permalink

    Thanks so much Adam- really clear and concise post! Started to get me thinking….

  15. Posted February 4, 2010 at 8:51 am | Permalink

    Anything new on this? I had thought that the dimension change was right around the corner. I’ve got several pages I’m updating, and I’ve set them all to 520 – looks a little strange when the page is still 760! Trying not to have to go back and forth with this width issue, and having to re-re-design my fan pages again.

  16. Posted April 26, 2010 at 10:50 am | Permalink

    Is this actually happening?

    I keep hearing about this 'early 2010' move and am increasingly aggravated by the lack of information that FB have supplied devs, outside of a vague roadmap with no real update schedule in place.

    520px works great for some things but it's a huge pain for other designs and will require extensive overhauls to ensure the fludity and clarity of the apps remain the same.. What's more, i gather the canvas size is remaining the same, the app inside of a tab will be 520px and the app when viewed through the apps.facebook.com address, will remain at the original 760px size?! and we still have no idea as to how existing apps will be navigated within this space? will they scroll, will they simply lopp off content? what is this new space being used for?

    The lack of information from the source here is very bewildering..

  17. Posted April 27, 2010 at 2:17 pm | Permalink

    Hey Dave,

    Thanks for your comment. I can't possibly agree more. Apparently the change *is* happening – but its vague launch date really is bewildering, as you said. Also, I have no idea what will happen with that extra space, or what will happen to the existing tabs. Maybe extra ad space? Just to be super safe, we're designing everything in 520px.

-->
Sign in with Facebook

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
blog comments powered by Disqus